Training and review

What is the difference between trading review and backtesting?

First, the short version

A backtest runs saved indicators and the batch's conditions across a sample pool, then reports local metrics, fills, charts, and equity curves. Review diagnostics examines decisions already made in Free Replay, including margin and position safety and the retained archive. Challenge results and notes remain in their own workspaces. None of these results predicts the future.

Who this is for

Use this distinction when deciding whether you need to test a repeatable rule, inspect your own practice decisions, or do both. Zinuto provides separate local workflows for strategy backtests and behavior-focused review.

What to take away

  • Backtesting is rule-centered; review is behavior-centered.
  • Both can be useful, but they answer different questions.

How Zinuto helps

Build a backtest from a saved indicator

Choose a saved indicator, signal conditions, sample pool, trading environment, capital, and execution mode, then explicitly run a local batch.

Review practice behavior

Use Review diagnostics for Free Replay overview metrics, margin safety, and the archive. Create a note from training context when needed, then organize it separately in Notes.

What to watch

  • Backtest results depend on the selected historical data, signal conditions, trading environment, and simulated execution assumptions.
  • Neither a historical backtest nor a practice review proves or predicts future results.

Next step

  • Run a local backtest when you want to apply a saved indicator and the signal conditions chosen for this batch across a sample pool.
  • Use Review diagnostics for metrics, margin safety, and Free Replay archives; use Notes separately for the reasoning you saved from training context.

Continue with a practical guide

Start with one short replay

Pick a sample, hide the later bars, make a few decisions, and open the archive afterward. That single run shows how Zinuto records practice.